tango4
June 30th 04, 05:26 PM
There is another thread on RAS proposing a change to the "once only" rule.
Other threads have discussed the use of COTS loggers.
I'd like to see a subdivision of loggers available that do not support
barometric pressure sensors. This could be implemented quite simply by
having a clause that states the policy for verifying flights not requiring
precise barometric pressure traces.
Something along the lines of:
For height gain badges and records a logger supporting full barometric
recording is required.
For distance flights the 1000m height loss rule may need modification
depending on the logger type used.
Why bother with this?
1 - It is my experience that the barometric pressure sensor section of a
logger contributes at least 30% of the overall manufacturing cost of these
units so doing away with that section should lead to an immediate drop in
cost of 30% of such loggers.
2 - It gives current logger manufacturers a means to stay in the game when
the switch is finally made to COTS acceptance.
Any thoughts on this in RAS land
Ian
Other threads have discussed the use of COTS loggers.
I'd like to see a subdivision of loggers available that do not support
barometric pressure sensors. This could be implemented quite simply by
having a clause that states the policy for verifying flights not requiring
precise barometric pressure traces.
Something along the lines of:
For height gain badges and records a logger supporting full barometric
recording is required.
For distance flights the 1000m height loss rule may need modification
depending on the logger type used.
Why bother with this?
1 - It is my experience that the barometric pressure sensor section of a
logger contributes at least 30% of the overall manufacturing cost of these
units so doing away with that section should lead to an immediate drop in
cost of 30% of such loggers.
2 - It gives current logger manufacturers a means to stay in the game when
the switch is finally made to COTS acceptance.
Any thoughts on this in RAS land
Ian